Connect with us

Support The NewsHawks

US$2m compensation to 734 for Gwayi-Shangani villagers too little

News

US$2m compensation to 734 for Gwayi-Shangani villagers too little

Published

on

HUMAN rights defenders say the government’s proposed US$2 million relocation fund is insufficient to provide modern amenities for villagers who are facing displacement to pave way for the Gwayi-Shangani Dam project.

NATHAN GUMA

734 families facing eviction in Gwayi-Shangani to share US$2m compensation, too little – Human rights defenders

An estimated 734 families in the catchment area are facing eviction to create room for the project being implemented by the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (Zinwa) and China International Water and Electric Corp.

 Human rights defenders say the amount is insufficient to build infrastructure and facilities that will be destroyed in the relocation process.

“If shared equally … it is US$2 725 per household — assuming that everyone gets an equal share of the compensation package,” says Khumbulani Maphosa, Matabeleland Institute for Human Rights coordinator.

“Building an average modern-day four-roomed house using standard and durable material will cost an average of US$3 700 (excluding labour) and a modern toilet may cost an average of US$500 (excluding labour). This means an average modern 4-roomed home with an average modern toilet built to standard will cost about US$4 200,” he said.

Maphosa said, on average, the allocation would be US$1 425 less than the amount needed for basic modern accommodation.  The government would need to plan on replacing amenities that will be destroyed in the relocation process, he added.

“This means that there will be nothing left for social amenities that will be destroyed which are currently in existence, such as: a primary school, 60 boreholes and a dip tank. The government should give a cost breakdown for each for the sake of transparency and accountability,” he said.     

   The villagers have also been complaining about the lack of consultation in the resettlement process and an unclear resettlement plan. Environmental lawyer Darlington Chidarara says the government should have a proper resettlement plan for the people.

 “Projects done should benefit the people. If the project is supposed to benefit the people, it means that the investor should get a social licence from the people,” Chidarara said.

“Their rights must be respected. Government and the people should be on the same page. That’s why we speak about prior and informed consent.”

 Villagers in the Lubimbia area of Hwange district have been complaining that poor communication in the resettlement process is likely to undermine their rights to education, water and cultural heritage.

 Chidarara said the government should improve land entitlement for villagers in future to allow for compensation. He said loose land ownership systems have been unfavourable to victims, thereby stalling compensation processes.

“Most of the projects happen in areas where there is a communal land rights system,” he said. “Government knows that people do not have much entitlement to the land. We have seen this in Chiadzwa and Chisumbanje.”

 In Chiadzwa, villagers were force-evicted through the deployment of armed forces to pave way for a diamond-mining investor.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Advertisement

Popular